1.0COURT SLIPShttps://gwilliamslaw.com/court-slipsrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Od3kCTyeXO"><a href="https://gwilliamslaw.com/court-slips/marin-v-king-county/">Marin v. King County, 194 Wn.App. 795 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2016)</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://gwilliamslaw.com/court-slips/marin-v-king-county/embed/#?secret=Od3kCTyeXO" width="600" height="338" title="“Marin v. King County, 194 Wn.App. 795 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2016)” — COURT SLIPS" data-secret="Od3kCTyeXO" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://gwilliamslaw.com/court-slips/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js </script> In Marin v. King County, Ignacio Marin appealed the trial-court's dismissal of his lawsuit against his former employer, King County (County) that was based upon claims of disparate treatment, hostile work environment, and failure to accommodate disabilities. Because he failed to support several assignments with adequate argument, citations to the record, and legal authority, and the remaining assignments lacked merit, the appellate court affirmed.https://i0.wp.com/gwilliamslaw.com/court-slips/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/cropped-Logo-Court-Slips-Official.png?fit=240%2C237&ssl=1240237