Skip to content
LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY A. WILLIAMS

LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY A. WILLIAMS

Employment-Law Trial Attorney

  • Home
  • START
  • About
  • Practice Areas
  • Research
  • The Rundown
  • Employment Law 101
  • The Lab
  • Law and Logic
  • WSHRC Digest
  • WA Canons
  • FAQ
  • Law Digest
  • Court Slips
  • Law Group
  • Free Forms
  • Consultations
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Category: Law & Logic

Posted on November 12, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Zero-Sum Bias

Law & Logic: Zero Sum Bias
Lesson #25: Zero Sum Bias

In logic, what does the term “Zero-Sum Bias” mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Zero-Sum Bias”

Posted on November 5, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Argument from Fallacy or Bad Reasons Fallacy

Law & Logic: Argument from Fallacy or Bad Reasons Fallacy
Lesson #24: Argument from Fallacy or Bad Reasons Fallacy

In logic, what does the term “argument from fallacy” (or “bad reasons fallacy”) mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Argument from Fallacy or Bad Reasons Fallacy”

Posted on October 29, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Ipse Dixit Fallacy or “It Simply Is”

Law & Logic: Ipse Dixit Fallacy or "It Simply Is"
Lesson #23: Ipse Dixit Fallacy or “It Simply Is”

In logic, what does the term “Ipse Dixit Fallacy” or “It Simply Is” mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Ipse Dixit Fallacy or “It Simply Is””

Posted on October 22, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Hasty Generalization

Law & Logic: Hasty Generalization
Lesson #22: Hasty Generalization

In logic, what does the term “hasty generalization“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Hasty Generalization”

Posted on October 15, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Argumentum Ad Nauseam

Law & Logic: Argumentum Ad Nauseam
Lesson #21: Argumentum Ad Nauseam

In logic, what does the term “argumentum ad nauseam“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Argumentum Ad Nauseam”

Posted on October 8, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion

Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion
Lesson #20: Appeal to Emotion

In logic, what does the term “appeal to emotion“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion”

Posted on October 1, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity

Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity
Lesson #19: Argument from Incredulity

In logic, what does the term “Argument from Incredulity“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity”

Posted on September 24, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent

Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent
Lesson #18: Affirming the Consequent

In logic, what does the term “Affirming the Consequent” mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent”

Posted on September 17, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)

Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)
Lesson #17: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)

In logic, what does the term Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent) mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)”

Posted on September 10, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy

Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy
Lesson #16: Conjunction Fallacy

In logic, what does the term Conjunction Fallacy mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy”

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Next page

Talk With Attorney Williams

Blog Categories

Blog Archives

Research

Visit Our Other Website

Williams Law Group Blog

Visit Our Other Website

Court Slips: WA State

Visit Our Other Website

Washington Employment Law Digest

Visit Our Other Website

Visit Our Other Website

Visit Our Other Website

FREE Washington Legal Forms

If you want peace, prepare for war.

Advertisement

LAW OFFICE OF
GREGORY A. WILLIAMS
P.O. Box 65854
University Place, WA 98464
253-396-9000

OUR WEBSITES:

Visit our general website: https://www.gawilliamslaw.com/

Visit our litigation headquarters: https://gwilliamslaw.com/

Visit our law group blog: https://gawlawgroup.blogspot.com/

COPYRIGHT & ATTRIBUTION:

Copyright 2010-26 Law Office of Gregory A. Williams All rights reserved. Website design, development, and S.E.O. by Williams Law Group.

DISCLAIMER, TERMS OF USE & PRIVACY

Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy

SERVICE AREAS:

Law Office of Gregory A. Williams proudly serves employees throughout Washington State including but not limited to the following: Algona, Auburn, Bellevue, Bellingham, Black Diamond, Bonney Lake, Buckley, Burien, Carnation, Clyde Hill, Covington, Des Moines, DuPont, Duvall, East Hill-Meridian, Eatonville, Edgewood, Enumclaw, Everett, Federal Way, Fife, Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Graham, Issaquah, Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Kenmore, Kennewick, Kent, King County, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Lakewood, Maple Valley, Medina, Mercer Island, Newcastle, Normandy Park, North Bend, Orting, Pacific, Pasco, Pierce County, Purdy, Puyallup, Redmond, Renton, Sammamish, Seattle, SeaTac, Shoreline, Snohomish County, Snoqualmie, South Hill, Spanaway, Spokane, Spokane Valley, Steilacoom, Sumner, Tacoma, Tukwila, University Place, Vancouver, Woodinville, Yakima, and Yarrow Point.

RCW 49.60 NOTICE:

Washington State declares that it is illegal to discriminate based on protected classes in the areas of employment, housing, places of public accommodation, real estate and credit transactions, and insurance. Protected classes include Race or Color; National Origin; Creed; Sex or Pregnancy; Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity; Veteran or Military Status; presence of any sensory, mental, or physical actual Disability or Perceived Disability; use of a trained Dog Guide or Service Animal by a person with a Disability; HIV or Hepatitis C; Marital Status (except in public accommodation); Breastfeeding (in public accommodation); Age (40+ employment only); and Families with Children (housing only). We provide aggressive legal representation on behalf of employees experiencing discrimination, wrongful termination (or discharge), harassment, hostile work environment, retaliation, and failure to provide reasonable accommodations.

  • YouTube
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Proudly powered by WordPress