Skip to content
LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY A. WILLIAMS

LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY A. WILLIAMS

Employment-Law Trial Attorney

  • Home
  • START
  • About
  • Practice Areas
  • Research
  • The Rundown
  • Employment Law 101
  • The Lab
  • Law and Logic
  • WSHRC Digest
  • WA Canons
  • FAQ
  • Law Digest
  • Court Slips
  • Law Group
  • Free Forms
  • Consultations
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

The Rundown

Posted on October 8, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion

Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion
Lesson #20: Appeal to Emotion

In logic, what does the term “appeal to emotion“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Appeal to Emotion”

Posted on October 3, 2026November 12, 2026

Harmful Employment-Law Idioms: “Playing the Race Card”

Harmful Employment-Law Idioms: "Playing the Race Card"


Why is the idiom “playing the race card” harmful for employment-discrimination victims? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Harmful Employment-Law Idioms: “Playing the Race Card””

Posted on October 1, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity

Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity
Lesson #19: Argument from Incredulity

In logic, what does the term “Argument from Incredulity“ mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Argument from Incredulity”

Posted on September 29, 2026November 12, 2026

Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation

Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation


Under Washington State laws, what are the elements of negligent misrepresentation? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation”

Posted on September 24, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent

Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent
Lesson #18: Affirming the Consequent

In logic, what does the term “Affirming the Consequent” mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Affirming the Consequent”

Posted on September 21, 2026November 12, 2026

Cat’s Paw Theory of Liability (WA State)

Cat's Paw Theory of Liability (WA State)


In Washington State, what is the cat’s paw theory of liability? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Cat’s Paw Theory of Liability (WA State)”

Posted on September 17, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)

Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)
Lesson #17: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)

In logic, what does the term Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent) mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Fallacy of the Inverse (Denying the Antecedent)”

Posted on September 15, 2026November 12, 2026

WA Code of Judicial Conduct: Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment

bWA Code of Judicial Conduct: Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment


Under the Washington Code of Judicial Conduct (hereinafter ,”CJC”), to what extent must a full‑time judge actively identify, prevent, and address bias, prejudice, or harassment while carrying out judicial duties? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “WA Code of Judicial Conduct: Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment”

Posted on September 10, 2026November 12, 2026

Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy

Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy
Lesson #16: Conjunction Fallacy

In logic, what does the term Conjunction Fallacy mean, and how does it apply to employment-law trial lawyers handling workplace disputes? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “Law & Logic: Conjunction Fallacy”

Posted on September 7, 2026November 12, 2026

The Tort of Outrage and Racially Discriminatory Action

The Tort of Outrage and Racially Discriminatory Action


Under Washington State law, can racially discriminatory action in employment form the basis for the tort of outrage (hereinafter, “tort of outrage” or “intentional infliction of emotional distress”)? Here’s my point of view. Continue reading “The Tort of Outrage and Racially Discriminatory Action”

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 … Page 30 Next page

Talk With Attorney Williams

Blog Categories

Blog Archives

Research

Visit Our Other Website

Williams Law Group Blog

Visit Our Other Website

Court Slips: WA State

Visit Our Other Website

Washington Employment Law Digest

Visit Our Other Website

Visit Our Other Website

Visit Our Other Website

FREE Washington Legal Forms

If you want peace, prepare for war.

Advertisement

LAW OFFICE OF
GREGORY A. WILLIAMS
P.O. Box 65854
University Place, WA 98464
253-396-9000

OUR WEBSITES:

Visit our general website: https://www.gawilliamslaw.com/

Visit our litigation headquarters: https://gwilliamslaw.com/

Visit our law group blog: https://gawlawgroup.blogspot.com/

COPYRIGHT & ATTRIBUTION:

Copyright 2010-26 Law Office of Gregory A. Williams All rights reserved. Website design, development, and S.E.O. by Williams Law Group.

DISCLAIMER, TERMS OF USE & PRIVACY

Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy

SERVICE AREAS:

Law Office of Gregory A. Williams proudly serves employees throughout Washington State including but not limited to the following: Algona, Auburn, Bellevue, Bellingham, Black Diamond, Bonney Lake, Buckley, Burien, Carnation, Clyde Hill, Covington, Des Moines, DuPont, Duvall, East Hill-Meridian, Eatonville, Edgewood, Enumclaw, Everett, Federal Way, Fife, Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Graham, Issaquah, Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Kenmore, Kennewick, Kent, King County, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Lakewood, Maple Valley, Medina, Mercer Island, Newcastle, Normandy Park, North Bend, Orting, Pacific, Pasco, Pierce County, Purdy, Puyallup, Redmond, Renton, Sammamish, Seattle, SeaTac, Shoreline, Snohomish County, Snoqualmie, South Hill, Spanaway, Spokane, Spokane Valley, Steilacoom, Sumner, Tacoma, Tukwila, University Place, Vancouver, Woodinville, Yakima, and Yarrow Point.

RCW 49.60 NOTICE:

Washington State declares that it is illegal to discriminate based on protected classes in the areas of employment, housing, places of public accommodation, real estate and credit transactions, and insurance. Protected classes include Race or Color; National Origin; Creed; Sex or Pregnancy; Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity; Veteran or Military Status; presence of any sensory, mental, or physical actual Disability or Perceived Disability; use of a trained Dog Guide or Service Animal by a person with a Disability; HIV or Hepatitis C; Marital Status (except in public accommodation); Breastfeeding (in public accommodation); Age (40+ employment only); and Families with Children (housing only). We provide aggressive legal representation on behalf of employees experiencing discrimination, wrongful termination (or discharge), harassment, hostile work environment, retaliation, and failure to provide reasonable accommodations.

  • YouTube
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Proudly powered by WordPress