July 2018 • WSHRC Digest

Form of Papers Filed With Administrative Law Judge

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning form of papers filed with the administrative law judge? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt guidelines regarding form of papers filed with the administrative law judge. See WAC 162-08-241, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

FORM OF PAPERS FILED WITH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

WAC 162-08-241 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses form of papers filed with the administrative law judge as follows:

(1) Caption. The notice of hearing shall include a full caption in substantially the following form:

(2) Form in general. Papers filed with an administrative law judge shall be in the form used for superior court practice. See in particular Rule 10, civil rules for superior court.

(3) Signing. Every pleading, motion or other paper filed on behalf of a party represented by an attorney shall be dated and signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s individual name, whose address shall be stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall similarly date and sign proceedings, motions and other papers and give the party’s address. The signature of a party or of an attorney constitutes a certificate by that person in accordance with the provisions of Rule 11, civil rules for superior court.

WAC 162-08-241 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

If you would like to learn more, then consider contacting an experienced Washington State Employment Discrimination Attorney as soon as possible to discuss your case. Please note: the information contained in this article is not offered as legal advice and will not form an attorney-client relationship with Law Office of Gregory A. Williams, P.S., Inc.; Williams Law Group, PS; or the author of this article. Please see our DISCLAIMER.

–gw

Jurisdiction — Independent Contractors

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment Regulations, what are the rules concerning jurisdiction (independent contractors)? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning jurisdiction (independent contractors). See WAC 162-16-230, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

JURISDICTION — INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS

WAC 162-16-230 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses jurisdiction (independent contractors) as follows:

(1) Purpose of section. RCW 49.60.180 defines unfair practices in employment. A person who works or seeks work as an independent contractor, rather than as an employee, is not entitled to the protection of RCW 49.60.180. This section outlines the standards that we will use to determine whether a person is an employee as distinguished from an independent contractor for the purpose of entitlement to the protection of RCW 49.60.180.

(2) Rights of independent contractor. While an independent contractor does not have the protection of RCW 49.60.180, the contractor is protected by RCW 49.60.030(1). The general civil right defined in RCW 49.60.030(1) is enforceable by private lawsuit in court under RCW 49.60.030(2) but not by actions of the Washington state human rights commission.

(3) General approach. We will consider all the relevant facts, particularly those bearing on the following factors. No one factor is determinative, but the most important is the extent to which the purchaser of work controls the manner and means of performance of the work.

(a) Control of work. An employment relationship probably exists where the purchaser of work has the right to control and direct the work of the worker, not only as to the result to be achieved, but also as to the details by which the result is achieved.

(b) Tools and place of work. Does the purchaser of the work or the worker furnish the equipment used and the place of work? Generally, the purchaser of work furnishes tools and equipment for employees while independent contractors furnish their own. Some employees furnish some of their own tools, however.

(c) Skill level involved. The skill required in the particular occupation. Skilled workers are typically less closely supervised than unskilled workers, but they are employees if indicia of employment other than close supervision are present.

(d) Type of work involved. The kind of occupation, with reference to whether the work usually is done under the direction of a supervisor or is done by a specialist without supervision. Some persons, such as lawyers or doctors, may be employees even though they are not closely supervised. The test for such specialists is not whether the lawyer or doctor is closely supervised, but whether he or she is treated the way that employed lawyers or doctors are commonly treated. Lawyers and doctors are typically independent contractors, however, with respect to their clients or patients.

(e) Duration of work. The length of time during which the person has worked or the length of time that the job will last. Independent contractors typically are hired for a job of relatively short duration, but there are instances of independent contracts for an indefinite period – for example, contracts for janitorial service.

(f) Method of payment. The method of payment, whether by time or by the job. Independent contractors are usually paid by the job but are sometimes paid by time. Employees are usually paid by time but are sometimes paid by the job.

(g) Ending the work relationship. Whether the work relationship is terminable by one party or both parties, with or without notice and explanation. An employee is usually free to quit and is usually subject to discharge or layoff without breach of the employment contract. An independent contractor usually has more fixed obligations.

(h) Leave. Whether annual leave is afforded. Leave with pay is almost exclusively accorded to employees.

(i) Integration of the work in the purchaser’s operations. Whether the work is an integral part of the business of the purchaser of it. Usually, employees rather than independent contractors do the regular work of a business.

(j) Accrual of benefits. Whether the worker accumulates retirement benefits. Retirement benefits are almost exclusively accorded to employees.

(k) Taxation. Whether with respect to the worker the purchaser of work pays taxes levied on employers, such as the Social Security tax, unemployment compensation tax, and worker’s compensation tax, or withholds federal income tax. The tax laws do not have the same purposes as the law against discrimination, so employee status for tax purposes is helpful but not controlling.

(l) Salary or income. Whether the worker treats income from the work as salary or as business income. See subsection (3)(k) of this section.

(m) Employer records. Whether with respect to the worker the purchaser of work keeps and transmits records and reports required of employers, such as those required under the worker’s compensation act. Worker’s compensation coverage, like tax coverage, is helpful but not conclusive.

(n) The intention of the parties. The fact that a contract says that the worker is an independent contractor will be considered in this respect, but it is not conclusive for the purpose of coverage of RCW 49.60.180.

(4) Burden of persuasion. The party asserting that the complainant is an independent contractor has the burden of proving that status.

WAC 162-16-230 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Preemployment Inquiry Guide — Purpose

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Preemployment Inquiry Guide, what is the purpose of the chapter? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the purpose of the chapter. See WAC 162-12-100, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

PURPOSE OF CHAPTER

WAC 162-12-100 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses the purpose of the chapter as follows:

(1) These regulations carry out the law against discrimination as stated generally in RCW 49.60.010 and 49.60.030, and interpret RCW 49.60.180 and 49.60.200 which declare certain preemployment inquiries to be unfair practices.

(2) The commission generally follows chapter 49.60 RCW and federal court decisions that interpret comparable statutes and rules. The commission will not follow federal precedents when a different interpretation of state statutes and rules will better carry out the purposes of chapter 49.60 RCW.

(3) This regulation cannot cover every question that might arise in connection with inquiries prior to employment. The commission expects that in most cases these rules, either directly or by analogy, will guide those who are covered by the law.

(4) Definition: In this chapter, the following words are used in the meaning given, unless the context clearly indicates another meaning.

“Protected status” is short for the phrase, “age, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression or gender identity, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person,” and means the full phrase (see RCW 49.60.180).

WAC 162-12-100 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Definition of Health Care Professional

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what is the definition of health care professional? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the definition of health care professional. See WAC 162-22-020, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

DEFINITION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

WAC 162-22-020 is the relevant regulation, and it defines health care professional as follows:

In this chapter the following words are used in the meaning given, unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

…

(6) “Health care professional” means a person whose license to practice includes diagnosis and assessment of the particular disability for which she or he issues a health care opinion.

WAC 162-22-020 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Definition of Dog Guide

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what is the definition of dog guide? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the definition of dog guide. See WAC 162-22-020, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

DEFINITION OF DOG GUIDE

WAC 162-22-020 is the relevant regulation, and it defines dog guide as follows:

In this chapter the following words are used in the meaning given, unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

…

(4) “‘Dog guide‘ means a dog that is trained for the purpose of guiding blind persons or a dog that is trained for the purpose of assisting hearing impaired persons.”

WAC 162-22-020 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Definition of Able Worker With A Disability

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what is the definition of able worker with a disability? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the definition of able worker with a disability. See WAC 162-22-020, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

DEFINITION OF ABLE WORKER WITH A DISABILITY

WAC 162-22-020 is the relevant regulation, and it defines able worker with a disability as follows:

In this chapter the following words are used in the meaning given, unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

…

(3) An “able worker with a disability” is a person whose disability does not prevent the proper performance, with or without reasonable accommodation, of the particular job in question.

WAC 162-22-020 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Dog Guides & Service Animals

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what are the rules concerning dog guides and service animals? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the dog guides and service animals. See WAC 162-22-100, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

DOG GUIDES & SERVICE ANIMALS

WAC 162-22-100 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses dog guides and service animals as follows:

(1) General rule. It is an unfair practice for an employer, employment agency, labor union, or other person to request that a trained dog guide or service animal be removed from the workplace, unless that employer, employment agency, labor union, or other person can show that the presence, behavior or actions of that dog guide or service animal constitutes an unreasonable risk to property or other persons.

It is an unfair practice to remove a trained dog guide or service animal from the entire workplace because the animal presents a risk of injury or harm when in part of the workplace.

(2) Assessing risk of injury or harm.

(a) Risk to property or other persons must be immediate or reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances, not remote or speculative. Risk to persons may be given more weight than risk to property. Risk of severe injury or harm may be given more weight than risk of slight injury or harm. For example, a principal excludes a teacher’s dog guide because; “A neighborhood dog bit one of our kids last year, so I don’t allow any dogs at school.” This is not “reasonably foreseeable risk” justifying removal of the dog guide.

(b) Annoyance on the part of staff or other customers of the workplace at the presence of the dog guide or service animal is not an unreasonable “risk to property or other persons” justifying the removal of the dog guide or service animal.

(c) Risk of injury or harm to the dog guide or service animal is not a reason for an employer to remove or exclude the animal. The decision whether to bring the animal to the worksite under such conditions most properly rests with the person with a disability using the dog guide or service animal.

(3) Reasonable accommodation. When risk justifies the removal of a dog guide or service animal from the workplace, efforts must be made to reasonably accommodate the person with the disability.

(4) Liability. Law other than the law against discrimination governs liability for injury or harm. Generally, a person with a disability using a dog guide or service animal is responsible for the animal and may be held liable for the behavior and actions of the animal.

WAC 162-22-100 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Health Care Opinions

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what are the rules concerning health care opinions? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the health care opinions. See WAC 162-22-090, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

HEALTH CARE OPINIONS

WAC 162-22-090 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses health care opinions as follows:

(1) Employers may seek a health care professional’s opinion on whether a person’s disability affects the proper performance of a particular job. The employer may also seek a health care professional’s opinion on possible effective accommodations that would enable the person with a disability to properly perform the job. The health care professional’s opinion will be given due weight in view of all the circumstances, including the extent of the health care professional’s knowledge of the particular person and job, and the health care professional’s relationship to the parties.

(2) A health care professional’s conclusion will not be considered to be an opinion on whether the person can properly perform the particular job unless it:

(a) Is based on the individual capabilities of the particular person, and not on generalizations as to the capabilities of all persons with the same disability; and

(b) Is based on knowledge of the actual sensory, mental, and physical qualifications needed for proper performance of the particular job.

(3) Employers are advised to provide the health care professional with the necessary information about the particular job and to inform the health care professional of the need for an individualized opinion.

(4) Employee health care information shall be kept in a confidential manner, separate from the employee’s regular personnel files. The employer may share health care information only on a need to know basis. Supervisors and/or safety personnel may be informed of employee needs only if necessary to make appropriate work assignments or develop appropriate emergency response plans.

WAC 162-22-090 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Employment–Handicapped Persons–Undue Hardship Exception

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what are the rules concerning the undue hardship exception? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the undue hardship exception. See WAC 162-22-075, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

UNDUE HARDSHIP EXCEPTION

WAC 162-22-075 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses the undue hardship exception as follows:

An employer, employment agency, labor union, or other person must provide reasonable accommodation unless it can prove that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship. An accommodation will be considered an undue hardship if the cost or difficulty is unreasonable in view of:

(1) The size of and the resources available to the employer;

(2) Whether the cost can be included in planned remodeling or maintenance; and

(3) The requirements of other laws and contracts, and other appropriate considerations.

WAC 162-22-075 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Preference For Disabled Not Unfair Practice

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what are the rules concerning preference for disabled? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning preference for disabled. See WAC 162-22-035, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

PREFERENCE FOR DISABLED IS NOT AN UNFAIR PRACTICE

WAC 162-22-035 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses preference for disabled as follows:

The law protects against discrimination because of the presence of any disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability. Discrimination in favor of a person because of the person’s disability is not an unfair practice. This is different from the operation of the statutes in all other areas, except for age discrimination. For example, it is an unfair practice for an employer to discriminate either for or against persons of any race or either sex.

WAC 162-22-035 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Employment–Handicapped Persons–Scope of Chapter

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Employment–Handicapped Persons Regulations, what are the rules concerning scope of chapter? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning scope of chapter. See WAC 162-22-010, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

SCOPE OF CHAPTER

WAC 162-22-010 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses scope of chapter as follows:

This chapter interprets and implements the disability discrimination coverage of:

(1) RCW 48.60.174 (unfair practices based on actual or perceived HIV infection);

(2) RCW 49.60.180 (unfair practices of employers);

(3) RCW 49.60.190 (unfair practices of labor unions);

(4) RCW 49.60.200 (unfair practices of employment agencies);

(5) RCW 49.60.210 (unfair to discriminate against persons opposing unfair practices); and

(6) RCW 49.60.220 (unfair to aid violation).

WAC 162-22-010 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity – Employee Benefits and Privileges

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity Regulations, what are the rules concerning employee benefits and privileges? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning employee benefits and privileges. See WAC 162-32-030, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS & PRIVILEGES

WAC 162-32-030 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses employee benefits and privileges as follows:

(1) Consistent and equal basis. Employee benefits provided in whole or in part by an employer must be consistent between all employees and equal for all employees, regardless of the employee’s sexual orientation or gender expression or gender identity. For example, it is an unfair practice to:

(a) Provide health insurance coverage to an employee’s opposite/different sex spouse but to fail to provide health insurance coverage to an employee’s same sex spouse (except in situations where such a rule is prohibited or preempted by federal law.)

(b) Provide parental leave or bonding time for the father of a child newly born or adopted into a heterosexual relationship, but fail to provide the same parental leave or bonding time to the parent of a child newly born or adopted into a same-sex relationship.

(2) Other benefits and privileges of employment. All other employee benefits, provided formally or informally including, but not limited to, health club memberships, discount programs, training, staff retreats, company gatherings and parties, and use of company vehicles or other company services, shall be provided on an equal basis to all employees regardless of the employee’s sexual orientation or gender expression or gender identity. If the benefit or privilege is extended to the employee’s opposite/different sex spouse, it must be extended to an employee’s same sex spouse as well.

WAC 162-32-030 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity – Leave Policies & Reasonable Accommodation

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity Regulations, what are the rules concerning leave policies and reasonable accommodation? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning leave policies and reasonable accommodation . See WAC 162-32-020, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

LEAVE POLICIES & REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

WAC 162-32-020 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses leave policies and reasonable accommodation as follows:

(1) Leave. When an employer grants leave or time off of work to employees for medical or health reasons, the employer shall treat leave requests to address medical or health care needs related to an individual’s gender expression or gender identity in the same manner as requests for all other medical conditions. For example:

(a) If an employer provides paid sick leave for periods of disability that require medical leave, the employer must provide paid sick leave for periods of disability related to an individual’s gender expression or gender identity that require medical leave;

(b) If the employer’s policy requires a medical provider’s statement to verify the leave period as a reasonable accommodation, a medical provider’s statement may be required to verify the leave period as a reasonable accommodation when the disabling condition is related to the individual’s gender expression or gender identity, however, an employer may not inquire if the leave is related to gender expression or gender identity or gender transition, nor can the employer require that the note specify if the leave is related to gender expression or gender identity or gender transition;

(c) If the employer’s policy permits the retention and accrual of benefits, such as seniority, retirement, and pension rights, during the leave period for other disabilities, the policy must also permit such accrual of benefits during leave for disabling conditions related to an individual’s gender expression or gender identity;

(d) If an employer allows an employee to use shared leave for disabling conditions, the employer must apply the same policies and procedures for disabling conditions related to an individual’s gender expression or gender identity.

(2) Reasonable accommodation. An employer shall provide reason-able accommodation for a disability when the disability is related to the individual’s gender expression or gender identity, absent undue hardship to the employer. Such reasonable accommodation includes, but is not limited to, medical leave for medical and counseling appointments, surgery, and recovery from surgery that are related to gender reassignment procedures and treatments. An undue hardship as a reason for denying an accommodation in situations involving disabilities related to gender expression or gender identity shall be analyzed in the same manner as with accommodations for any other disability. To the extent consistent with personal medical information connected to other disabilities, personal medical information connected to disabilities related to a person’s gender expression or gender identity must be kept confidential.

(3) Nothing in this section is intended to suggest that a per-son’s sexual orientation or gender expression or gender identity itself is a disabling condition.

WAC 162-32-020 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw