Tag: RCW 49.60.222

Relationship of Commission to Complainant

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning the relationship of the commission to complainant? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning relationship of the commission to complainant. See WAC 162-08-061, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

RCW 49.60.240
RCW 49.60.240 is additional statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning relationship of the commission to complainant. See WAC 162-08-061, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The text of the statute is as follows:
Complaint investigated—Procedure—Conference, conciliation—Agreement, findings—Rules.
(1)(a) Except as provided for in (c) of this subsection, after the filing of any complaint, the chairperson of the commission shall refer it to the appropriate section of the commission’s staff for prompt review and evaluation of the complaint. If the facts as stated in the complaint do not constitute an unfair practice under this chapter, a finding of no reasonable cause may be made without further investigation. If the facts as stated could constitute an unfair practice under this chapter, a full investigation and ascertainment of the facts shall be conducted.
 
(b) If the complainant has limitations related to language proficiency or cognitive or other disability, as part of the review and evaluation under (a) of this subsection, the commission’s staff must contact the complainant directly and make appropriate inquiry of the complainant as to the facts of the complaint.
 
(c) After the filing of a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction pursuant to RCW 49.60.222 through 49.60.225, the chairperson of the commission shall refer it to the appropriate section of the commission’s staff for prompt investigation and ascertainment of the facts alleged in the complaint.
 
(2) The investigation shall be limited to the alleged facts contained in the complaint. The results of the investigation shall be reduced to written findings of fact, and a finding shall be made that there is or that there is not reasonable cause for believing that an unfair practice has been or is being committed. A copy of the findings shall be provided to the complainant and to the person named in such complaint, hereinafter referred to as the respondent.
 
(3) If the finding is made that there is reasonable cause for believing that an unfair practice has been or is being committed, the commission’s staff shall immediately endeavor to eliminate the unfair practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
 
If an agreement is reached for the elimination of such unfair practice as a result of such conference, conciliation, and persuasion, the agreement shall be reduced to writing and signed by the respondent, and an order shall be entered by the commission setting forth the terms of said agreement. No order shall be entered by the commission at this stage of the proceedings except upon such written agreement, except that during the period beginning with the filing of complaints alleging an unfair practice with respect to real estate transactions pursuant to RCW 49.60.222 through 49.60.225, and ending with the filing of a finding of reasonable cause or a dismissal by the commission, the commission staff shall, to the extent feasible, engage in conciliation with respect to such complaint. Any conciliation agreement arising out of conciliation efforts by the commission shall be an agreement between the respondent and the complainant and shall be subject to the approval of the commission. Each conciliation agreement shall be made public unless the complainant and respondent otherwise agree and the commission determines that disclosure is not required to further the purposes of this chapter.
 
If no such agreement can be reached, a finding to that effect shall be made and reduced to writing, with a copy thereof provided to the complainant and the respondent.
 
(4) The commission may adopt rules, including procedural time requirements, for processing complaints alleging an unfair practice with respect to real estate transactions pursuant to RCW 49.60.222 through 49.60.225 and which may be consistent with the federal fair housing amendments act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), but which in no case shall exceed or be more restrictive than the requirements or standards of such act.

RELATIONSHIP OF COMMISSION TO COMPLAINANT

WAC 162-08-061 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses the relationship of the commission to complainant as follows:

(1) Commission‘s role and objectives. In investigating cases the commission seeks to ascertain the facts in order to make an impartial finding of “reasonable cause” or “no reasonable cause.” It has no predisposition in favor of either complainants or respondents. If “reasonable cause” is found, then the objective of the commission is to obtain the remedy that will best eliminate the unfair practices and prevent their recurrence. The judgment as to what will eliminate an unfair practice for purposes of reaching an agreement under RCW 49.60.240 is made initially by the executive director, or other staff persons pursuant to the executive director‘s direction, and ultimately by the commissioners. The judgment as to what will eliminate an unfair practice and carry out the purposes of the human rights law after hearing under RCW 49.60.250 is made by the administrative law judge. The commission was not designed to compete with the courts as a forum for the vindication of private rights; its task is to work for the public good of eliminating and preventing discrimination. Although the facts and circumstances giving rise to a claim of discrimination may sometimes give rise to other claims based upon other statutes or principles of common law, the commission will investigate only claims of unfair practices arising under chapter 49.60 RCW et seq. The law against discrimination expressly preserves the right of complainants and/or aggrieved parties to seek other civil or criminal remedies in court or other available forums, either simultaneously with a complaint filed with the commission or in lieu of such a complaint, subject to any limitations or conditions provided in WAC 162-08-062 or elsewhere.

(2) Independence from complainant. The commission‘s primary objective is to eliminate and prevent discrimination, which may or may not be consistent with the goals or objectives of a particular complainant or aggrieved person. In negotiating a settlement or seeking an order, the commission generally works for provisions restoring the complainant as nearly as possible to the position he or she would be in if he or she had not been discriminated against, because this is usually an effective way to eliminate the discrimination and prevent its recurrence. But where, in the commission‘s judgment, provisions fully restoring the complainant (for instance, reinstatement to the job with back pay) would be inadequate to eliminate a pattern of discrimination, the commission will hold out for additional terms, even though the respondent is willing to settle on the basis of full relief for the complainant only. Except as may be otherwise provided for complaints alleging unfair practices in real estate transactions, the commission may determine that discrimination will be effectively eliminated and prevented by an order that does not afford the complainant every item of relief to which he or she may have a legal claim. The commission assumes that persons who complain to it are as interested in the elimination and prevention of discrimination in general as in their individual cases. If a person is interested only in relief for himself or herself, he or she is advised to seek his or her remedy directly in court pursuant to RCW 49.60.020, 49.60.030 and/or WAC 162-08-062.

WAC 162-08-061 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

If you would like to learn more, then consider contacting an experienced Washington State Employment Discrimination Attorney as soon as possible to discuss your case. Please note: the information contained in this article is not offered as legal advice and will not form an attorney-client relationship with Law Office of Gregory A. Williams, P.S., Inc.; Williams Law Group, PS; or the author of this article. Please see our DISCLAIMER.

–gw

Complaints by Aggrieved Persons

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning complaints by aggrieved persons? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt guidelines regarding complaints by aggrieved persons. See WAC 162-08-071, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

Additional statutory authority is established by RCW 49.60.240 and RCW 34.04.020. See WAC 162-08-071, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body)

COMPLAINTS BY AGGRIEVED PERSONS

WAC 162-08-071 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses complaints by aggrieved persons as follows:

(1) Scope of section. This section applies to complaints by persons claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unfair practice filed under RCW 49.60.230 (1)(a), to complaints by employers or principals filed under RCW 49.60.230 (1)(c), and to complaints by “aggrieved persons” under RCW 49.60.040(15). Complaints issued by the commission are covered by WAC 162-08-072.

(2) Signature and oath. A complaint shall be in writing, signed by the complainant or the complainant’s lawyer, and sworn to before a notary public or other person authorized by law to administer oaths, or subscribed and signed under the following declaration: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.” Notarial service for this purpose is available without charge at all offices of the commission.

(3) Contents. A complaint shall contain the following:

(a) The name of the person making the complaint;

(b) The name, address and telephone number, if any, of the person against whom the complaint is made, if known to the complainant;

(c) A specific charge of an unfair practice(s);

(d) A clear and concise statement of the facts which constitute the alleged unfair practice(s);

(e) The date or dates of the alleged unfair practice(s), and if the alleged unfair practice is of a continuing nature, the dates between which said continuing acts of discrimination are alleged to have occurred.

(4) Forms. Printed complaint forms are available at all commission offices.

(5) Time for filing. For claims alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction under RCW 49.60.222 through 49.60.225, the complaint must be filed with the commission not later than one year after the alleged unfair practice occurred or was terminated. In all other unfair practice claims, the complaint must be filed within six months after the date of occurrence of the alleged unfair practice(s). RCW 49.60.230. If the alleged unfair practice is of a continuing nature, the date of the occurrence of the unfair practice shall be deemed to be any date subsequent to the commencement of the alleged unfair act up to and including the date when the alleged unfair practice stopped.

(6) Computation of time. The one-year period for filing a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction expires at 5:00 p.m. on the day before the corresponding day of the year following the event. The six-month period for filing a complaint alleging any other unfair practice expires at 5:00 p.m. on the day before the corresponding day of the sixth month following the event. If the last day of the filing period is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the time expires at 5:00 p.m. on the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. For example, a complaint of an event occurring on 5 January would ordinarily have to be filed by 5:00 p.m. on 4 July, but since 4 July is a legal holiday, the time for filing the complaint would expire at 5:00 p.m. on 5 July, or at 5:00 p.m. Monday, if 5 July comes on a Saturday or Sunday.

(7) Technical defects. A complaint shall not be considered defective if the defect is technical and can be corrected by subsequent amendment. The statutory requirements set forth in RCW 49.60.230, including the requirement of a signature under oath, are jurisdictional and failure to comply cannot be corrected by subsequent amendment.

WAC 162-08-071 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

If you would like to learn more, then consider contacting an experienced Washington State Employment Discrimination Attorney as soon as possible to discuss your case. Please note: the information contained in this article is not offered as legal advice and will not form an attorney-client relationship with Law Office of Gregory A. Williams, P.S., Inc.; Williams Law Group, PS; or the author of this article. Please see our DISCLAIMER.

–gw