Findings Archives • WSHRC Digest

Real Estate Transactions—Procedures

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning real estate transactions (procedures)? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt guidelines regarding real estate transactions (procedures). See WAC 162-08-09401, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added). Additional statutory authority is established by RCW 49.60.240. See WAC 162-08-09401, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body)

REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS—PROCEDURES

WAC 162-08-09401 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses real estate transactions (procedures) as follows:

(1) Upon the filing of a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction, the commission shall serve notice upon the aggrieved person acknowledging such filing and advising the aggrieved person of the time limits and choice of forums provided under RCW 49.60.230 and 49.60.2235.

(2) The staff shall, not later than ten days after such filing or the identification of an additional respondent under this subsection, serve on the respondent(s) a notice identifying the alleged unfair practice and advising such respondent of the procedural rights and obligations of respondents under this chapter, together with a copy of the complaint.

(a) A person who is not named as a respondent in the course of investigation may be joined as an additional or substitute respondent upon written notice in accordance with subsection (2) of this section.

(b) In addition to meeting the requirements of subsection (2) of this section, such notice shall state the basis for the commission‘s belief that the person to whom the notice is addressed is properly joined as a respondent.

(3) Each respondent may file an answer to a complaint not later than ten days after receipt of notice from the commission.

(4) Subsequent to the filing of a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction under RCW 49.60.222 through 49.60.225, the commission shall commence proceeding with respect to the complaint within thirty days after receipt of the complaint.

(5) The commission shall complete its investigation of an allegation of an unfair practice in a real estate transaction within one hundred days of filing a duly prepared and signed complaint with the commission, unless it is impracticable to do so.

(6) If the commission is unable to complete the investigation of the complaint within one hundred days of filing, commission staff will advise the parties in writing of the reasons for not completing the investigation in the time allotted.

(7) The commission shall make final administrative disposition of a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction within one year of the date of receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the commission is unable to do so, it shall notify the parties in writing of the reasons therefor.

(8) The commission may also investigate unfair practices in a real estate transaction to determine whether a complaint should be brought by the commission itself pursuant to RCW 49.60.230 (1)(b).

WAC 162-08-09401 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

If you would like to learn more, then consider contacting an experienced Washington State Employment Discrimination Attorney as soon as possible to discuss your case. Please note: the information contained in this article is not offered as legal advice and will not form an attorney-client relationship with Law Office of Gregory A. Williams, P.S., Inc.; Williams Law Group, PS; or the author of this article. Please see our DISCLAIMER.

–gw

Termination of a Case Without Findings of Fact

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning termination of a case without findings of fact? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

TERMINATION OF A CASE WITHOUT FINDINGS OF FACT

WAC 162-08-099 is the relevant regulation, and it states that the rules concerning termination of a case without findings of fact are follows:

(1) Authorized. The commission in appropriate circumstances may terminate its action on a case without making findings of fact pursuant to RCW 49.60.240. This section provides procedures in some of the circumstances.

(2) Withdrawal of complaint. No findings or other procedures in RCW 49.60.240 and 49.60.250 are necessary when the complainant has requested withdrawal of the complaint and the commissioners have consented to the withdrawal pursuant to WAC 162-08-091.

(3) Settled before finding. Except as may be otherwise provided for a complaint alleging an unfair practice in a real estate transaction, a complaint may be settled before findings of fact are made, when the commission‘s staff and a respondent have entered into a written settlement agreement (prefinding settlement). Prefinding settlement agreements shall be presented to the commissioners. The commissioners, if they approve, shall enter an order setting forth the terms of the agreement, using the same procedure as if the agreement were presented to the commissioners under RCW 49.60.240 and WAC 162-08-106 after findings of fact. A prefinding settlement is not binding on the commission until the commissioners vote to accept it and issue their order.

(4) Administrative closure. A case may be administratively closed by vote of the commissioners when the complaint has been resolved informally, or has been adjudicated in another forum, or has become moot, or cannot be investigated because the complainant or respondent cannot be found, or when other circumstances justify administrative closure. Administrative closure is an official termination of work on a complaint prior to completion of the entire statutory process, letting the complaint lie in its present posture. A case that has been administratively closed can be administratively reopened by vote of the commissioners.

WAC 162-08-099 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Findings

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning findings? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning findings. See WAC 162-08-098, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

FINDINGS

WAC 162-08-098 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses findings as follows:

(1) General. The findings document shall contain (a) findings of fact, and (b) an ultimate finding of reasonable cause or no reasonable cause for believing that an unfair practice has been or is being committed, or a finding on jurisdiction, as provided in (2) of this section.

(2) Jurisdictional dispositions. When the facts found show that the matter is not within the jurisdiction of the commission, the ultimate finding shall be “no jurisdiction” rather than “reasonable cause” or “no reasonable cause.” In extraordinary circumstances where the commission technically has jurisdiction but for overriding reasons of law or policy is unable to properly exercise its jurisdiction, the ultimate finding may be “jurisdiction declined.” An example of such an extraordinary circumstance is a complaint against the commission itself.

(3) Scope of reasonable cause finding. A finding of reasonable cause shall specify the unfair practice found and, as nearly as possible, the person or persons against whom the unfair practice has been committed. If the facts show an unfair practice against a class of persons, the class shall be indicated to the extent possible.

(4) Action by commissioners. Findings of no reasonable cause shall be reported to the commissioners at a meeting, and shall thereafter stand as the action of the commission unless the commissioners vote to set aside a particular finding. Findings of reasonable cause shall be used by the staff for the purpose of endeavoring to eliminate the unfair practices by conference, conciliation, and persuasion. Proposed findings of “no jurisdiction” or “jurisdiction declined” shall be reported to the commissioners and shall become commission action when approved by vote of the commissioners at a meeting.

(5) Effect of findings. A finding that there is or is not reasonable cause for believing that an unfair practice has been or is being committed is not an adjudication of whether or not an unfair practice has been or is being committed.

WAC 162-08-098 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Protective Orders

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning protective orders? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning protective orders. See WAC 162-08-096, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

PROTECTIVE ORDERS

WAC 162-08-096 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses protective orders as follows:

(1) Upon motion by a party or by the person from whom information is sought pursuant to WAC 162-08-09501, and for good cause shown, the chairperson of the commission may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense caused by revealing private information, or trade secrets, including all orders a court can make under CR 26(c).

(2) If a motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the chairperson may, on such terms and conditions as are just, order that any party or person provide or permit information to be revealed subject to the provisions of WAC 162-08-097.

(3) The chairperson may, on such terms and conditions as are just, grant a protective order sealing the produced documents pursuant to WAC 162-04-035.

WAC 162-08-096 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Failure To Provide Information

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the rules concerning the failure to provide information? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt rules concerning the failure to provide information. See WAC 162-08-097, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION

WAC 162-08-097 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses the failure to provide information as follows:

(1) Order compelling production of information. The chairperson of the commission is authorized to make any order that a court could make under CR 37(a), including an order awarding expenses of the motion to compel production of information pursuant to WAC 162-08-09501. The executive director, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may obtain an order compelling production of information by motion to the chairperson of the commission. The form of the motion and the procedure for its disposition is governed by WAC 162-08-019. When taking testimony under oath, the proponent of the question may either complete or adjourn the examination before moving for an order compelling production of information.

(2) Enforcement of an order compelling production of information. If the party fails to comply with a subpoena compelling production of information, the matter may be turned over to counsel for the commission for enforcement of the order in superior court.

WAC 162-08-097 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Reconsideration of Findings

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the guidelines regarding reconsideration of findings? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY (RCW)

RCW 49.60.120(3) is the statutory authority enabling the WSHRC to adopt guidelines regarding reconsideration of findings. See WAC 162-08-101, WA State Legislature Website (bottom of page body). The statute declares that the WSHRC has “the function[], power[], and dut[y] … [t]o adopt, amend, and rescind suitable rules to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the commission in connection therewith.” RCW 49.60.120(3) (hyperlinks added).

RECONSIDERATION OF FINDINGS

WAC 162-08-101 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses reconsideration of findings as follows:

The commission may reconsider and correct any finding in which errors affecting the result are brought to its attention.

WAC 162-08-101 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw

Referrals To Staff

by Gregory Williams, Esq. | Under Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) Practice-and-Procedure Regulations, what are the guidelines regarding referrals to staff? Here’s my point of view (NOTE: please read our DISCLAIMER before proceeding).

REFERRALS TO STAFF

WAC 162-08-093 is the relevant regulation, and it addresses referrals to staff as follows:

Unless the chairperson of the commission directs otherwise for a particular complaint, all complaints shall be investigated by the section of the staff designated for that purpose by the executive director, and the executive director shall have full power to assign and reassign cases for investigation by particular staff persons, and to assign and reassign staff persons to the section of the staff that investigates complaints, on a full-time or part-time basis.

WAC 162-08-093 (emphasis added) (hyperlinks added).

LEARN MORE

–gw